No meio deste artigo encontram-se verdadeiras pérolas deste processo:
In the Napster court case it presented as a witness a music retailer who said that Napster had caused a significant drop in his revenue. Only after a detailed examination by the defendants was it revealed that the retailer had relocated his shop to a position where there was less passing trade and that he had switched from selling CDs to selling vinyl records. He was forced to concede that perhaps these had a significant impact on his revenue and that he was making some assumptions about Napster.
Isto pode parecer despropositado, mas num tempo em que a liberdade (ou ilusão dela) se transforma mais num produto de consumo do que um direito fundamental, estas afrontas das multinacionais não ajudam nada.



