D12 Escreveu:podes ter razão e o ser memo bom esse av mas tens sites com revies dele?
Eu sei que tenho razão.. descansa..
virusbtn Escreveu:In past comparative reviews KAV has generally been criticised for three factors: updates, interface and default settings. Of these the method of updating was probably the one that caused the most pain, since the nature of comparative reviews requires that updating be performed manually. This is a function of the testing environment, rather than a problem likely to be encountered by real-world users. While manual updating requires the transfer of numerous files, the automatic version used for these tests was far more simple.
The interface was a problem likely to present itself to all users. However, the interface of this version is easy to handle from the start and can be considered a marked improvement from this perspective. There are more control options available in KAV Personal Pro – so that version may be worth considering for more advanced users, despite a less friendly interface.
The recommended settings for KAV are very much proposed as the ‘correct’ settings, with warning triangles being produced if settings are experimented with. This is both likely, and presumably designed, to dissuade users from making changes to the configuration without being confident of the results. This is undeniably a good thing, so long as the default settings are appropriate. In terms of scanner settings these tests revealed no major problems. All files are scanned, which removes one of KAV’s past problems: that of certain extensions being missed.
There were concerns about the settings for updates and the initial scan. Since updates occur automatically only at three-hourly intervals, no update is performed by default when a machine is booted. What is more, there is no provision for an update on boot. If, for example, a user arrives home from holiday and powers up their machine, the virus definitions might be as old as two weeks for up to three hours. Given some of the fast-spreading worms of recent months this would be ample time to infect the machine before the update is triggered.
Considering the product as a whole, many of the issues put forward during past comparative reviews have either been rendered null or proven to be an issue only under test conditions. The product has become simpler to use, though some small niggles remain concerning updating. Kaspersky has a good record for constant change and improvements to their scanners, so it is entirely reasonable to expect that this issue will be addressed sooner rather than later.
PS - Isto é só um exemplo.. mas se queres reviews "á balda".. pede ao nosso amigo "google" que te ilumine o caminho..
If I offended you in anyway, please don't take it personally... it's not your fault you're an idiot!
)
